Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Machine Learning in Pharmaceutical Research
Articles

Machine Learning Models for Fraud Detection in Health Insurance Claims: Techniques, Applications, and Real-World Case Studies

Bhavani Prasad Kasaraneni
Independent Researcher, USA
Cover

Published 21-03-2024

Keywords

  • Health insurance fraud,
  • Machine learning

How to Cite

[1]
Bhavani Prasad Kasaraneni, “Machine Learning Models for Fraud Detection in Health Insurance Claims: Techniques, Applications, and Real-World Case Studies”, Journal of Machine Learning in Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 110–147, Mar. 2024, Accessed: Jan. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pharmapub.org/index.php/jmlpr/article/view/42

Abstract

Healthcare fraud, particularly within the realm of health insurance claims, poses a significant financial burden on healthcare systems globally. This fraudulent activity diverts resources away from legitimate medical care and increases healthcare premiums for honest policyholders. Machine learning (ML) offers a powerful approach to combatting this issue by enabling the identification of fraudulent claims with greater accuracy and efficiency compared to traditional methods.

This research delves into the application of ML models for detecting fraud in health insurance claims. The paper commences by outlining the various types of health insurance fraud, highlighting the prevalence and financial impact of this criminal activity. Next, the core principles of machine learning are presented, encompassing supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and anomaly detection techniques. These techniques are subsequently explored within the context of health insurance claim analysis.

Supervised learning algorithms, trained using historical data labeled as fraudulent or legitimate, form the cornerstone of ML-based fraud detection systems. This section delves into prominent supervised learning models, including logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting. Each model's strengths and weaknesses are evaluated, along with their suitability for identifying specific types of health insurance fraud.

Unsupervised learning techniques, in contrast, analyze unlabeled datasets to uncover hidden patterns and anomalies. This section explores the application of clustering algorithms, such as K-means clustering, and outlier detection methods to identify claims exhibiting characteristics deviating significantly from the norm, potentially indicative of fraudulent activity.

Following the exploration of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques, the paper investigates the critical role of feature engineering in optimizing the performance of ML models. Feature engineering encompasses the process of selecting, transforming, and creating new features from raw claim data. This section discusses various feature engineering techniques tailored to health insurance claim analysis, emphasizing their impact on model accuracy and generalizability.

A pivotal aspect of this research involves the examination of real-world case studies demonstrating the successful implementation of ML models for fraud detection in health insurance claims. These case studies encompass diverse healthcare systems and insurance providers, showcasing the adaptability and effectiveness of ML approaches across different contexts. Each case study delves into the specific ML models employed, feature sets utilized, and the achieved outcomes in terms of fraud detection accuracy and cost savings.

Furthermore, the paper acknowledges the challenges and limitations associated with employing ML for health insurance fraud detection. Potential biases within historical data sets, the evolving nature of fraudulent schemes, and the need for continuous model retraining are addressed. Strategies to mitigate these challenges are explored, including data augmentation techniques, active learning approaches, and the integration of domain expertise into the model development process.

This research paper comprehensively examines the application of machine learning models for detecting fraud in health insurance claims. By offering an in-depth analysis of various techniques, real-world case studies, and the limitations inherent to ML-based approaches, this paper provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners within the healthcare insurance sector. The exploration of emerging trends, such as deep learning and explainable AI (XAI) methods, paves the way for further advancements in the fight against healthcare fraud.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Y. Xiao, X. Zhang, Y. Luo, and S. Liu, "Healthcare fraud detection based on ensemble learning," PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 12, p. e0226631, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226631
  2. M. S. Obafemi and A. O. Dada, "Machine learning for fraud detection in healthcare: A review," Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41939-019-0094-2
  3. Potla, Ravi Teja. "Enhancing Customer Relationship Management (CRM) through AI-Powered Chatbots and Machine Learning." Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research 9 (2023): 364-383.
  4. Singh, Puneet. "Leveraging AI for Advanced Troubleshooting in Telecommunications: Enhancing Network Reliability, Customer Satisfaction, and Social Equity." Journal of Science & Technology 2.2 (2021): 99-138.
  5. Ravichandran, Prabu, Jeshwanth Reddy Machireddy, and Sareen Kumar Rachakatla. "Generative AI in Business Analytics: Creating Predictive Models from Unstructured Data." Hong Kong Journal of AI and Medicine 4.1 (2024): 146-169.
  6. T. Fawcett, "An introduction to ROC analysis," Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861–874, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
  7. D. Harris, "Handling missing data," International Statistical Review, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 517–530, Nov. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1749-679X.tb01088.x
  8. G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, "An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R," Springer, 2013.
  9. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, "The elements of statistical learning," Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
  10. X. Yin, J. Lee, and K. E. Choi, "A hybrid approach for anomaly detection in streaming data with concept drifts," Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 775–792, Sept. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10115-015-0882-z
  11. V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, "Anomaly detection: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1–58, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1145/1541881.1541882
  12. A. L. Beam and M. M. Kohane, "Big data in medicine: History, methods, and future," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 1835–1841, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2206101
  13. J. M. Perlis, R. A. Perera, M. H. Drew, and F. M. Atienza, "Perceptions of data privacy in healthcare: A review of the literature," Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 17, no. 5, p. e132, May 2015, doi: 10.2196/jmir.3973
  14. HIPAA Privacy Rule, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, https://www.hhs.gov/programs/hipaa/index.html, accessed Jul 16, 2024
  15. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), GDPR.eu, https://gdpr.eu/, accessed Jul 16, 2024
  16. Potla, Ravi Teja. "Integrating AI and IoT with Salesforce: A Framework for Digital Transformation in the Manufacturing Industry." Journal of Science & Technology 4.1 (2023): 125-135.
  17. Rachakatla, Sareen Kumar, Prabu Ravichandran, and Jeshwanth Reddy Machireddy. "AI-Driven Business Analytics: Leveraging Deep Learning and Big Data for Predictive Insights." Journal of Deep Learning in Genomic Data Analysis 3.2 (2023): 1-22.
  18. Machireddy, Jeshwanth Reddy, and Harini Devapatla. "Leveraging Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with AI and Machine Learning for Scalable Data Science Workflows in Cloud-Based Data Warehousing Environments." Australian Journal of Machine Learning Research & Applications 2.2 (2022): 234-261.
  19. Pelluru, Karthik. "Integrate security practices and compliance requirements into DevOps processes." MZ Computing Journal 2.2 (2021): 1-19.
  20. A. Rudin, A. Mehrabi, M. Saghavi, S. Nair, K. Gummadi, and S. Mishra, "The algorithmic bias problem in machine learning," in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 2319–2327, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3219819.3220007
  21. S. Blooma, S. Greenwald, L. Britton, and S. Miklau, "Fairness in the age of algorithmic decision making," FCRC Working Paper No. 2017-002, 2017.